THE LAST DITCH

Reconciling Views and Relationships

I was disconcerted to be told by Hercules over dinner last week that I am a racist. He based this assessment on his reading of my article Progressing Back to the Middle Ages in which I wrote this;

Perhaps the Yom Kippur attack in Manchester is not a pogrom as it’s just one killer and not a mob? Either way, it’s a fall from grace. I am ashamed for my nation and furious that our “leaders” are still wittering on about “Islamophobia.” A phobia is an irrational fear. There is nothing more rational than fearing Islam — a religion conceived as if to justify the sins of its founder – one of the worst men who ever lived. 

Contrast him, the principal prophet of his religion, with Christ during his brief life on Earth. A warlord, slaver, rapist, racist and paedophile vs the embodiment of kindness, forgiveness and love.

He asked if I meant what I had written. I said that I did. I told him that in my opinion Allah is another name for Satan. As is evidenced by the actions carried out in his name. I am judging the tree by its fruits.

He said I was going too far and that I was now actually a racist. It wasn’t going to affect his friendship with me. He’d known me for a long time. He was aware of my other virtues. However, I should be aware that most “ordinary” people in Britain would perceive me as such. I should expect to be cut off by family and friends if I persisted. He wouldn’t blame anyone for doing so.

I was stunned. I am used to being called bad names by leftists. Being thought of this way by an old friend was a blow. I have spent over a week now reflecting on it and asking myself if it is true.

I asked another good friend her view. You’ll remember my journey from Prague to Aquitaine with Babicka last year. She didn’t regard me as a racist but considered me an extremist. She didn’t know anyone else who thought as I did. She could not understand why I wrote as I did for all to read, including my family and friends. She thought it crazy that I shared so much with my modest readership.

They’re strangers, who cares what they think, FFS?!

So two out of three of my friends in this country (I haven’t yet discussed this with the third, known here as the Navigator) think I’m extremist at best and racist at worst.

Neither wants to offer any arguments as to why my views are wrong. They’re addressing mainly my tone and the way it’s perceived by others out of genuine concern for my well-being. They’re not saying openly it’s a mental health issue. Given their advice to me to self-edit to avoid offence, maybe they’re doing the same?

It’s hard to know if they’re right of course. If I were mad, I wouldn’t know. My only comfort is something I read somewhere. It said that if you’re considering the possibility that you might be mad, you’re probably not!

I don’t have an opinion that would not have been considered normal by the great thinkers of the Enlightenment. None of my thought is original. It’s all derived from them. I think of my views as conformist to the norms that shaped our civilisation – rather than current fashions. Is it crazy now to think like Locke, Smith or Paine?

This is very much a first world problem, I realise, but it’s difficult. I don’t want to alienate my family. I love them. My hopes for a happy future depend upon spending time with them. The idea of dying isolated and estranged is frankly terrifying.

I also don’t want to alienate my friends close at hand. Three of them is not really enough! I have more friends in Poland and Russia. However, my mobility is now so poor. I’d find it hard to visit them any more.

If keeping the people I love requires playing a part, I suppose I could. I aspired to be an actor in my youth. I told Babicka, rather emotionally I admit, that I might as well die as live pretending to be someone else. Yet I have been giving it more thought since we spoke.

The relevant people would probably pretend it was real even if my performance was unconvincing. The price of not doing it is likely – if I take the kindly, well-meaning advice of Hercules and Babicka at face value – to be dire.

The fear of violent retribution from Mohammed’s chums wouldn’t persuade me to change. I’d love to die a noble, meaningful death. It’s the fear of being cut off from everyone I love that gives me pause.

In the end though, what else is there for any man to do but follow Shakespeare’s advice:

To thine own self be true

Is it too much to ask that the others in my life should not accept, but at least respect, my views that differ from theirs? I would certainly hope not. I never had a problem hearing some of the (by modern standards) outlandish views of my elders in my youth. I listened and then went on to live according to my own ideas. I didn’t need their permission and I didn’t need them to change. What’s so different now?

6 responses to “Reconciling Views and Relationships”

  1. formertory / MarkC Avatar

    One man’s meat…..

    I keep reading about this “liberal” thinking which is supposed to characterise London-dwellers. Here (in Lincolnshire) almost everyone I know would regard your views as entirely rational and generally, very much in the mainstream of a population seeing their country, culture and society pulled apart.

    By coincidence (for I’m not much of a culture vulture, I’m afraid) I chanced upon a Philip Larkin poem this morning and was so struck by it I linked it to several friends. Writing in 1972 Larkin rails against the loss of the beauty which he sees as being “England” and while he’s mainly taking aim at at a “give me more” culture and the despoiling of countryside and cultural icons (with a bit of a sly dig at capitalism). One can’t but help wondering what on earth he’d make of solar farms, boat people, Islamisation and preferential treatment of followers of that vile religion and its terroristic leanings, or of “social media”. Especially when measured against the inadequacy and incompetence of our leaders. By the standards of 1972 I think your feelings and opinions would indeed be extreme and quite possibly racist; mine certainly would be. By the standards of 2025, we’re rational and in fact, too bloody tolerant for our own good.

    https://thepoetryhour.com/poems/going-going/

    Enjoy!

    MarkC

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Lord T Avatar
    Lord T

    I’m not really surprised. You live in the Leftie capital of the UK and most down there are pretty woke. You missed knowing what they were like because of your time abroad and if you had been UK based you would probably have fallen out with them decades ago during a political issue by one of their heros, Bliar. I could describe them as friends although they will be friendly enough until push comes to shove and they will make a choice. It won’t be the compromise that you think it will be.

    Stick to family. You have ties to them and although yours seem to all be lefties at least it will be easier to compromise your soul and make peace for the benefits of the grandkids. You don’t have to discuss politics with the grandkids and you can at the very least try and steer them in the right direction. Your own kids you can just ignore politics although they won’t want to while they can still educate the heathen.

    Find real friends who you can have reasonable discussions with and if you agree to disagree then it isn’t a big deal.

    I don’t envy you your position. My kids are not too bad and just want to be left alone and they just roll their eyes when I go off on one but we have never fallen out over it.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. tom.paine Avatar

    Thanks for your words of encouragement, gents.

    I don’t have a problem with political or spiritual differences and never have. As long as people have goodwill, I accept that – like me – they’re trying as best they can to think and live well. I am ready to listen and talk to them about their approach, however wrong I think it is. From friends, I expect as much in return.

    I am struggling at the moment – and the events at Bondi Beach hammer it further home – with an aching fear that my civilisation is in danger. A danger that my gentle, misguided, wonderful friends refuse to acknowledge. The way things are going, the article I wrote referencing the Prophet could get me in gaol or targeted for violence.

    If I am afraid to write it, however, then we’ve lost.

    Frankly I wish I’d built a far bigger platform on which to say it. I can see why those who care about me might feel that I don’t need to do it. Concern for my safety would be heart-warming and understandable. This is not that though, is it?

    I expect to be called names by my political opponents. It’s been one of my most consistent criticisms of them that they try to stifle debate by doing that. It seems to work and they’re clearly not (as witness the new Islamophobia definition) going to stop.

    The shock that has stopped me in my tracks however is that a trusted friend on the Centre-Right, whom Margaret would have called a “Wet,” is now doing the same. That’s what’s given me pause for thought.

    My family’s welfare (though I have little influence on it now) will always be my prime concern. When I worry about the future of Britain, it’s not really me – but my daughters and my granddaughter – that I fear for. I am nearing the exit and have the resources to live comfortably until I reach it.

    I could easily take Hercules’ kindly advice (received today in his Christmas Card) to

    “stop digging deeper and deeper into that rabbit hole. It’s time you returned to the light and fresh air there still is up here.”

    That would mean closing down the political side of this blog and focussing on my hobbies and interests. It feels selfish. It feels cowardly. It feels like a betrayal of my Jewish friends, immediately, and of my every value in the end.

    Which all sounds, when I read it back, a bit narcissistic. I, and my opinions, don’t matter that much. Maybe I should just shut up and be as happy as age and circumstance permit? I am in many ways blessed.

    I could just get in my car and drive to Scotland with all my camera gear. I could hire some nice redhead model to stand in the foreground of my shots. I could edit my work of an evening while drinking the malt whisky I love. I could tell myself I’m an artist not a politician. What would be wrong with that? I admire many people who do it.

    I am sincerely puzzled though why more people are not – at least – as conflicted as I am.

    It’s estimated that over 100,000 young girls have been raped in our country, having been targeted by gangs for not being Muslim and therefore fair game. Our local and national authorities, our police and our social services covered it up. They committed crimes themselves (e.g. being an accessory to rape) in order to do so. The enquiry now underway, which – shamefully – is only happening because a foreign billionaire took up the case, is being stitched up. The victims are being sidelined and Labour bigwigs put in charge. There’s no hope of justice from that direction.

    A third of Britain’s Jews are actively planning to leave a place that has been pretty safe for them since the Middle Ages. They fear, God help us all, a pogrom on this sceptred isle. I think their fear is justified. One was recently attempted in Manchester.

    Why do these facts not fill more Britons with the shame and disgust I feel? Why does the fact that it pains me, make people think I am (which could not be further from the truth) “far right” or – God help me now, from the lips of one of my best friends – “racist?”

    I have spent too much time on this blog over the years expressing opinions with such thundering certainty that few readers have felt inclined to comment. In all humility now, I need guidance. Help!

    Like

    1. Lord T Avatar
      Lord T

      Why don’t you stick with what you are doing on the blogs but simply withdraw from discussion on politics with your ‘friends’ and family. Life will be much easier and you don’t have to compromise your opinions.

      When this happened at work and people got miffed with my comments I then started to say ‘I’m not allowed to talk about things like this as I get reported by snowflakes’

      Good luck.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. tom.paine Avatar

        Conversationally, I already operate on NATO “no first strike” principles. I am not going to start a political discussion with family or friends, unless someone else kicks off. The problem is that they already know about the blog and some read it.

        Like

  4. Lord T Avatar
    Lord T

    The problem is that they already know about the blog and some read it.

    Why is that an issue? If they don’t like what you are saying they can stop reading or, and this is unlikely with them being snowflakes, comment and discuss their views. If they don’t do that but instead pressure you to censor yourself then just tell them ‘You are not going to discuss this with them as you don’t want to upset them.’

    or you could get their IPs and block them from reading your blog. Just show a placeholder.

    The alternative is you censor yourself.

    Like

Leave a reply to tom.paine Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar