THE LAST DITCH

To what, precisely, are we woke?

The late Mrs P.'s contribution to this blog used to be to prevent me overstating my case. I used to write it from our bed at home in Moscow, hours ahead of my target audience. I would then pass it to her and go make coffee. When I hit "send," it would be on her toned-down version. The main reason I have blogged less since she died is despair. A secondary reason is that I lack confidence in my own restraint. I don't want to taint worthy ideas with my own crudeness of expression. I miss my editor. 

I am far from alone in my weakness but at least I am aware of it. Calm, reasoned arguments are rarer than at any time in my long life. It seems we can't easily now be friends with people of different opinions. A conversation that has flowed for decades without a moment's fear or pause ended earlier this year with the mis-description by an old friend of Israel's actions in Gaza as "genocide." it was made clear that, for our pleasant evening to continue, I must say nothing further on the subject; not even to contradict that lie.

Recently, a family member told me she doesn't want to see me again for a while because she interpreted my expressions of concern about her happiness as calling her a failure. I said no such thing. My admiration and respect for her abilities are boundless. I simply asked why she'd persist with a career she didn't find socially or financially-rewarding when she could choose to do anything she pleases? If I am ever to see her again, apparently, I must learn to edit my every word as if in the presence of the Stasi.

This from someone who'd not hesitated to tell me that my mind was poisoned by over-exposure to "far-right" social media and that I had wasted my retirement in consequence because I hadn't engaged positively with society. I spent a few days thinking about that criticism – and praying about it. I accepted it was offered kindly. I didn't erupt and flounce. 

I still love (and not in the way I'm now required as a Christian to try to love everyone) those misguided friends and family, but the relationship is altered forever by the requirement of silence. True friends are those with whom we can be ourselves without fear. Besides, if we were all of the same opinion, what would even be the point of conversation? 

Most puzzling to me, these new social rules often don't seem proportional to the importance of the subject. We have "feminists" who focus on mansplaining, manspreading and other such trivia while defending regimes, religions and ideologies that actively oppress women. We have #MeToo enthusiasts who "believe women" unless they're Jews, or white working-class girls being raped by Muslim gangs.

It's as if the concerns of a small privileged slice of society are now the entire range of permitted discussion. As if we have a new ruling class focussed on its own inward-looking, rather trivial regime of manners. The rest of us simply don't count. We can be disparaged, slapped down and silenced with cries of "far right", "racist", "Zionist" or "Islamophobe" by people who – for all the resources devoted to their education – it often seems are just uncritically spouting received wisdom. They may be "woke", but they're barely thinking at all.

5 responses to “To what, precisely, are we woke?”

  1. mickc Avatar
    mickc

    The Israel/Palestinian thing is very emotive.
    The key point is whether Israel’s ongoing response to the October 7th atrocity is reasonable and proportionate.
    Many think it is not. What is your view?
    For what it’s worth my view is that Britain has no vital interests affected by it. But I strongly object to British citizens of whatever religion being assaulted on British streets because of their “creed”.
    It happened in Gateshead a few years ago. I knew then that it was, unfortunately, only the start.

    Like

  2. Devil’s Kitchen Avatar
    Devil’s Kitchen

    “ We have “feminists” who focus on mansplaining, manspreading and other such trivia while defending regimes, religions and ideologies that actively oppress women. We have #MeToo enthusiasts who “believe women” unless they’re Jews, or white working-class girls being raped by Muslim gangs.”
    Indeed. And they share the same base characteristic as those who can’t hear counter-opinions, i.e. cowardice.
    DK

    Like

  3. Henry Crun Avatar
    Henry Crun

    You are not alone. I daren’t talk about anything political in my family or their circle of friends.
    I’m beginning to think that a hermit lifestyle may not be so bad after all.

    Like

  4. Baron Jackfield Avatar
    Baron Jackfield

    I can’t remember where, a long time ago, I heard or saw the comment that “Those on the left see those on the right with whom they disagree as evil, whereas those on the right see those on the left with whom they disagree as essentially good but misguided” but I fear that the same still applies today, but perhaps even more strongly. Certainly, as I see it, the aggressive offence takers / “cancellers” all seem to be from the socially “un-conservative” segment of society.

    Like

  5. Lord T Avatar
    Lord T

    That was your money well spent on an education. Someone who isn’t confident at being questioned and yet feels confident enough to question everything you do. Another future leader.
    Sorry to hear about that but it isn’t uncommon and many familes have been ripped apart by the results of decades of feminism.
    Just be yourself. If she sees you as the enemy then there is nothing you can do except debase yourself and support her delusions. Do you really think it is worth it?

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar