THE LAST DITCH

Bradley Manning sentenced to 35 years in prison – live updates | World news | theguardian.com.

The Guardian suddenly seems to be my newspaper. Soon I will have to take back all those Guardian reader and Guardianista jibes over the years. Or perhaps not. At the moment it's doing a good job of covering the civil liberties crisis in America and the British state's toadying complicity. 

For example, it's reporting the swingeing sentence on whistle-blower Bradley Manning. I think the ACLU best sums up my own opinion on the subject;
…a legal system that doesn't distinguish between leaks to the press in the public interest and treason against the nation will not only produce unjust results, but will deprive the public of critical information that is necessary for democratic accountability. This is a sad day for Bradley Manning, but it's also a sad day for all Americans who depend on brave whistleblowers and a free press for a fully informed public debate.
Birgitta Jonsdottir, the Icelandic MP associated with Wikileaks, makes the killer point though;
…no-one has been held accountable for the criminality exposed in the documents for which Manning is standing trial – except him.
As modern statists continue to replace the rule of law with the rule of men that's not exactly surprising. Those walking free committed their crimes in the service of the state so of course they will not be prosecuted.

If the rule of law applied; if there was a brave prosecutor to say "Be you never so high, the law is above you" then the story would be different, but that's not the reality of the post 9/11 West. Manning's punishment is not for any harm he may have done to intelligence assets, but for letting the supposed owners of the state in question – the American people – know what it was doing in their name. So much for accountability.

Stories such as this that give the lie to the statists' deliberate blurring of the distinction between people, nation and state. Any notion that "the state is us" is ridiculous. It's a massive power centre that is supposed to be accountable to us, but which lashes out violently at any of its people naieve enough to behave as if that's true. Recently, the British state has even been caught boasting to the American state about how unaccountable its agents are. 

I suspect there has also been a pretty good (and incredibly hypocritical, given the American state's usual posture on sexual diversity) attempt to smear him. He has been made out to be a social cripple, a sexual deviant and a general nut job. This is what any of us can expect if we incur the wrath of the servants who think they are our masters. Is it any wonder I erupt when purveyors of horrific tosh emerge from behind the skirting boards to tell us these gangsters have "far more moral legitimacy" than private citizens?

Bradley Manning is a good servant of the American people. He was a bad servant of the American state. He knew the risks he took in blowing the whistle and he blew it anyway. Don't let a state that tells you – when it suits its purpose – that your colour, creed or sexual orientation are irrelevant then use sexual and other smears to mask the courage of what he did.

4 responses to “Barackading the Manning”

  1. Moggsy Avatar
    Moggsy

    That all seemed to make good sense. You sometimes wonder why certain things were created, like mozzies, or the Guardian, then one day suddenly you see a reason ^_^
    I wonder if Manning would do it or do it the same if he had it to do all over?

    Like

  2. ubermouth Avatar
    ubermouth

    Thank you for writing this so beautifully. I loved the line: ” It’s a massive power centre that is supposed to be accountable to us, but which lashes out violently at any of its people naieve enough to behave as if that’s true.” So true.
    “…..but will deprive the public of critical information that is necessary for democratic accountability.” I think that was the point. I think he was a scapegoat used to cripple the mere thoughts of any future whistleblowers who may have the integrity to warn us of our government’s wrong-doings.
    The sentence was a tragedy,but then they have stand your ground laws in areas densely populated with blacks,which has increased substantially the murders of blacks in those states.

    Like

  3. cuffleyburgers Avatar
    cuffleyburgers

    Hi TP – while I appreciate and agree with your views on civil liberties in general, I think there is an important point to be made regarding leaking of information which will compromise intelligence assets in countries such as China, Russia and Iran. Such disclosures cause immense damage to legitimate and necessary efforts by the government in the general defence, to the agents in question who will likely be arrested and possibly done to death in gruesome ways all with out achieving any gain in liberty to the citizen of Western countries.
    I do not know the extent to which this is the case with Manning or Snowden but I suspect that the case brought of treason is not entirely unjustified.
    I stand to be corrected of course if necessary by people better informed than I am.

    Like

  4. Tom Avatar

    Treason is the excuse, not the reason. Bradley (or Chelsea, if you like) Manning was acquitted of aiding the enemy and I suspect Snowden would be too – though I don’t blame him for avoiding the chance of settling any bets on that. The authorities are mainly agitated by the exposure of illegal and immoral – indeed downright evil – conduct by their thugs and lackeys.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar

    They are servants. Just not of the public. He gets a full pension because he did his job for his…

  2. alec5384's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar