THE LAST DITCH

“Pure fallacy from beginning to end” at Catallaxy Files.

 
In this video, Milton Friedman deals with the left’s eternal favourite, the broken window fallacy. When I was a student politician, there was a Trot called Andy on the NUS executive. After every conference motion, he screwed up the papers and threw them on the ground exclaiming “more jobs!” His stupidity was rather funny then, but when it dominates economic thinking it’s less amusing.

Money is a token. It has no intrinsic value. It’s only useful as a means of exchanging goods and services. The measure of our wealth is the quantity of goods and services available to be exchanged and therefore our ability to produce them. Money should, if properly managed, track the value of that wealth, but that doesn’t mean it’s the same thing – as witness the fact that making more of it simply reduces its purchasing power.

Government jobs are overhead. Almost every business has to have some overhead, but business people understand that it must be kept to the necessary minimum. All libertarians ask is that voters understand that at a national level as well as they do in their everyday dealings. 

h/t razor-sharp ozblog Catallaxy Files

7 responses to “Spending isn’t good; what’s good is producing”

  1. Diogenes Avatar
    Diogenes

    Money is not merely a token that tracks the value of wealth, I wish it were. More and more, money is a slave. If you accumulate enough you can put it to work and you and your progeny can retire for all eternity. Where is the productivity in that?
    Whole nations have realised this. Brunei pretty much gave up work years ago and even as the oils runs dry the slave works on.
    Norway’s sovereign wealth fund will continue to transform a workaday nordic state into a pseudo-socialist minerva with cradle to grave nannying.
    What will we do in a generation’s time when China’s asset base is so vast that they too take semi retirement and look to the world to wipe their collective arse.
    Such wealth is not inflationary as it is never spent, it is maintained or grown and only the income from it is used.

    Like

  2. Cascadian Avatar
    Cascadian

    I don’t wish to be too pedantic, but when you say-“making more of it simply reduces its purchasing power”. Did you mean “central bank printing” rather than “making”.
    Christmas is fast approaching, may I wish you and all the commentors a very happy Christmas.

    Like

  3. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    “What will we do in a generation’s time when China’s asset base is so vast that they too take semi retirement and look to the world to wipe their collective arse.”
    Make more machines and ignore them.

    Like

  4. Mark Avatar
    Mark

    Jobs are an overhead.

    Like

  5. Tom Avatar

    I stand corrected. Yes I meant central bank "printing" in the widest metaphorical as well as literal sense. Merry Christmas to you too and thank you for all your sage contributions.

    Like

  6. Tom Avatar

    Jobs are a cost. Not all costs are overheads. Some are directly relevant to production. 

    Like

  7. james higham Avatar

    Money should, if properly managed, track the value of that wealth, but that doesn’t mean it’s the same thing
    And that’s the bottom line.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mark Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar

    They are servants. Just not of the public. He gets a full pension because he did his job for his…

  2. alec5384's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar