THE LAST DITCH

Dead federal retirees paid $120 million yearly, report says – The Federal Eye – The Washington Post.

Just to hammer home my point that it's not the character or intelligence of public sector employees that – for the most part – I question. It's the whole concept of big government itself and all the Milton Friedman Category IV spending it involves. The good old US of A is (of course) no better in this respect – for all its entrenched religiosity and superior financial education;

In one dramatic case, a deceased annuitant’s son continued receiving federal benefits until 2008 — 37 years after his father’s death. OPM [the federal government's Office of Personnel Management] learned of the improper payments — which exceeded $515,000 — only after the son also died. The agency never recovered the payments.

I do not seek to detract from the son's crime. The government might have sent him the cheques in error, but he cashed them in sin. But seriously. If it were your money, would you have kept paying without ever checking?

Of course, if you are an American taxpayer, it was your money and (by the agency of your public servants) you did. Just like British taxpayers bought six billion pounds' worth of military equipment which our public servants (at best) lost, (at worst) sold to the enemy or (most likely) some combination of the two.

I am sorry, but this kind of thing is not a glitch to be ironed out in the model. It is the model. Big government trashes lives by locking good people into unproductive work financed by extortion from the productive work of others. How many decades of this nonsense will it take before belief in the intrinsic moral superiority of government action dies?

4 responses to “Incompetence is not a bug, it’s a feature”

  1. Andrew Duffin Avatar
    Andrew Duffin

    “How many decades of this nonsense will it take…”
    So far, the answer is about five or six, depending on exactly when you started counting.
    The final answer is of course unknown at this time.
    I fear it may not be within our lifetimes, which is a depressing thought.

    Like

  2. Moggsy Avatar

    Absolutely I do agree. But that makes for short less interesting comments from me ^_^

    Like

  3. Moggsy Avatar
    Moggsy

    A more interesting thought, but maybe not quite where you were going with the post…
    do wonder if incompetence really is a feature… like in an actually desirable feature?
    Why is it that lots of the scary anti freedom stuff like biomettic ID cards or a database of all children, that Labor in the UK wanted to bring in didn’t happen?
    Mostly thanks to incompetence it looks to me, computer ssytems that didn’t works things like that. Silver linings.

    Like

  4. Tom Paine Avatar

    I didn’t say that incompetence was a good ‘feature’, but you are right (again). Sometimes our only hope is that our oppressors are too stupid to grind us down thoroughly.

    Like

Leave a reply to Moggsy Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar