THE LAST DITCH

Cameron backs phone hacking probe | Reuters.

As m'learned friend Wiggy (aka @_millymoo) explains, there are numerous offences to be investigated in the context of unauthorised access to another's mobile phone account. Those should now be investigated by the police and prosecuted vigorously by the Crown Prosecution Service.

A 'public inquiry' or even (God help us) 'inquiries', as mooted by the Prime Minister, will just provide opportunities for politicians to score points off each other. It will further infantilise a debate that is already being conducted, not least by Milliband Minor at PMQs today, at the level of an afternoon TV chat show.

Worst of all, the distinguished member of 'the Great and the Good" who chairs the inquiry will feel the need to immortalise him/herself by coming up with "deliverables" to be implemented by government. The most likely deliverables are bad laws that will interfere with press freedom.

Pace Mr Milliband it's no mere 'technicality' that a political inquiry can do nothing useful (to the extent any of them ever do) until police investigations – and any court cases resulting from them – are over. But as Wiggy points out;

The Met obviously cannot investigate itself, and any inquiry has to question why the [previous] investigations were so poor; whether (as has been alleged) officers were being paid for information by News of the World, and whether there is any nexus between the two.

So rather than launch a pointless, expensive public inquiry, why doesn't the PM suggest to the Home Secretary that the Chief Constable of another force, unsullied by these suspicions of bribery, takes over the criminal investigation? That could then lead promptly to the only 'public inquiry' that really matters; a criminal trial or trials.

It is time for justice, not political circus. All the names being bandied about are innocent until they are proven guilty. However, it seems clear that a largeish group of individuals, including some journalists, at least one editor, a private investigator and an unknown number of policemen are long overdue in the dock to account for their behaviours. There is more at stake here now than journalistic ethics.

2 responses to “Cameron’s over-inquiring mind”

  1. Patrick Harris Avatar
    Patrick Harris

    Can I, on behalf of sceptics everywhere, suggest that the inquiry has been given the green light because sufficient time has passed for everyone, who is anyone, (according to THEM) have all had time to cover their electronic arses.
    I could be wrong.

    Like

  2. Tom Paine Avatar

    And you could be right. On the other hand, Mrs P. asked this morning why “that muppet Cameron” didn’t fight back when Milliband attacked his judgement in hiring Coulson. What about the Labour leadership’s judgement in office, she asked, in sucking up so shamelessly to the Dirty Digger’s minions? I fear the reason why obscure backbenchers are having a field day is that they were the only ones not compromised by such relationships. And that, of course, only because they were not important enough to rate Rebekah’s attention. Cameron himself seems to be in remarkably deep with the most over-promoted PA on the planet.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar