THE LAST DITCH

What do I think about higher rate taxpayers losing child benefits? I think it's a start. Having or not having children is a personal choice. The government has no legitimate role in the matter, whether brandishing sticks or carrots. Successive governments have encouraged us to breed, however, merely in an attempt to delay the collapse of their giant Ponzi scheme – the welfare state.

Mrs P. and I didn't claim the child benefits to which we were entitled. We didn't need them and preferred to have as little contact with the rude and malodorous British state as possible. It has caused some unexpected problems for the Misses P., as Britain's bureaucracy has no record of their existence. No National Insurance number was issued to either of them at 16, as the database is apparently linked to child benefits. They recently had to present themselves to the Home Office to be interviewed as to their status. It says something about our country that failing to take the state's shilling is regarded as suspicious.

These benefits used to be tax allowances. If the state must incentivise people to have children that was surely a better way to do it? Allowances are valuable only to taxpayers with the wherewithal to raise their children. Under such a system, in fact, the more able they are to afford them, the greater the incentive. Benefits have rather the opposite effect. There's no need to earn money in order to receive them. People may indeed be incentivised to have children they cannot afford.

For my own part, I think the state should stay out of reproductive issues. Only people who want children and are capable of caring for them should have them. There should be a single tax allowance per earner, fixed at a level higher than the minimum wage/maximum benefits, and a single rate of tax. The more you earn, the more you would pay, but without any higher rates to punish extra effort. If you choose to live child free and spend the money saved on other things, good luck to you. If you want children and are lucky enough to be able to have them, good luck to you too (and to them).

When Miss P. the Elder was born, my then boss told me I would never make a more expensive investment, nor a better one. He was right. My children have cost more than any other category of expense, but I have never regretted a penny. I wanted children and no government could have taxed me out of it. Had I not wanted them, no government could have incentivised me into it. The current wailing and gnashing of teeth about changes to benefits is – in my view – rather pathetic. Grow up, Britain, and shoulder your responsibilities. There is great pleasure to be derived from it.

9 responses to “Of reproduction and incentives”

  1. Mr Eugenides Avatar

    I had the same problem when I started working – having lived abroad when I turned 16, and with my parents having chosen not to claim rather than deal with government bureaucracy, the state essentially had no centralised record of me. And, ooh, they didn’t like that.
    So I was required to attend an interview which lasted for over an hour. It involved my taking along every scrap of paper I had which could prove my identity, including birth certificate, driver’s license, utility bills, bank statements, university records – you name it – and then trying to persuade the guy that I was indeed British, rather than some Nigerian chancer trying to suck money out of the state.
    The highlight of the interview was when they produced a form which asked for details of trip over 4 weeks in length that I had taken outside the UK in the past 10 years – dates, duration, flight numbers. Given that I had gone to Greece for school or university holidays three times every year since 1984, I could only laugh at them.
    At the end of the hour they proclaimed that they were not yet ready to issue my number and that they would do so within 4-6 weeks. They never got back to me; only three months later did my new NI number magically show up on my payslip.
    All this to get a NI number not to claim a benefit, but so I could have the privilege of starting to pay tax. I wish I’d never bothered.

    Like

  2. Suboptimal Planet Avatar

    It says something about our country that failing to take the state’s shilling is regarded as suspicious
    Well said! I’m glad you’ve weighed in here, Tom. I’ve been commenting on the Daniel Hannan and Norman Tebbit blogs, as well as my own, and there seems to be a strange acceptance of the status quo.
    There should be a single tax allowance per earner, fixed at a level higher than the minimum wage/maximum benefits, and a single rate of tax.
    That certainly would be an improvement on the status quo. Ultimately, of course, I would like to see both the minimum wage and income tax abolished.

    Like

  3. Bucko Avatar

    We don’t have any children. This puts us in the position where we pay full taxes, are entitled to nothing back and use virtually nothing of what the government has to offer. I’m of the opinion that it’s the childless that should get tax breaks as we don’t use the education system and rarely the NHS.
    “”Grow up, Britain, and shoulder your responsibilities””
    It’s a very nice thought but im not holding my breath.

    Like

  4. jameshigham Avatar

    For my own part, I think the state should stay out of reproductive issues.
    It should stay out of almost every effing issue.

    Like

  5. Tom Paine Avatar

    Well said, dear boy but one post at a time, eh?

    Like

  6. Tom Paine Avatar

    Of course, but an infantilised population must be coaxed step by step. We libertarians need not part from the sturdy yeomenry of conservatism for many steps on the long, hard road to come and should bring as many of them as we can as far as that parting. Indeed, I suspect many “libertarians” will take their road when the time comes. When statism is rampant it’s easy to be “libertarian”, but if the state was within more reasonable bounds, enthusiasm would wane. Many current “libertarians” in Britain are really just disgusted Conservatives.

    Like

  7. Tom Paine Avatar

    Yes, that’s exactly what happened to the Misses P.

    Like

  8. Tom Paine Avatar

    You may be too pessimistic. Where the state does not intrude the old spirit is still to be found. Consider the enthusiasm with which working class pub goers raise money to send sick kids to America when the NHS refuses some new or expensive treatment. Self reliance is not dead, it has just been backed into a corner by an over mighty state. Scrooge’s cry of “are there no workhouses?” has its modern echoes.

    Like

  9. Suboptimal Planet Avatar

    You are right, of course. To what extent our Coalition government represents the ‘sturdy yeomenry of conservatism’ is an open question.
    Hope you’re enjoying Vancouver. Do take a drive up the coast if you have time.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mr Eugenides Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar