THE LAST DITCH

– Bishop Hill blog – ++++Statement from Norfolk Police++++.

It seems the debate on climate change really is over. Tasked with investigating the breach of security at the University of East Anglia Climate Research Unit ("climategate") the Norfolk Constabulary has involved "officers from the National Domestic Extremism Team."

As GOT explains, taking up the story:

If you go on to the National Domestic Extremism website, they proudly display an explanation of what constitutes 'domestic extremism':

"The terms are generally used to
describe the activity, individuals or campaign groups that carry out
criminal acts of direct action in furtherance of a campaign. These
people and activities usually seek to prevent something from happening
or to change legislation or domestic policy, but attempt to do so
outside of the normal democratic process."

This unit was originally set up to monitior the activities of "animal rights" fanatics who were conducting criminal campaigns of violent intimidation. What a very sad example of "mission creep." When one considers the sometimes noble history of the British Left in campaigning for issues "outside of the normal democratic process", how particularly sad that its erstwhile flagship party should be in charge of such activities.

The majority of British people believe that climate change is real, but is not necessarily caused by man. As Dan Hannan observed, "it would be ridiculous to believe in climate stasis." I suspect the majority would also applaud an unknown whistle-blower or even an external hacker who exposed the dishonest activities of the Climate Research Unit. Thanks to that unknown person, we know about the manipulation of research data and the denial of data access to other scientists for review. Worst of all, we know that the CRU destroyed much original data, which can now never be verified. Yet our authorities response is to tackle the "extremism" of the campaigners, not that of the scientists. Am I alone, regardless of the scientific truth of climate change, in finding that disturbing?

In the present economic climate, many young people are contemplating, faute de mieux,
careers in the public sector. There are of course many respectable
occupations in public service. The only advice I can give to such young
people is that state or state-sponsored organisations involved in the
formulation, promotion, implementation or enforcement of policy are no longer respectable. The moral compass of the British Establishment – always somewhat wonky – is now definitively broken.

Young people considering such careers are setting out on a path that may lead them, at the least, to moral compromise. I am afraid it could lead them to much worse. I remember my own desperate urge at that age to achieve adult independence. I understand the pressures they are under to begin their careers in a terrible market, but entering the service of repression is never the right path. These are times to test young souls and I feel for them.

6 responses to “Criminal dissent?”

  1. john miller Avatar
    john miller

    Where were they when the Greens defaced the power station? Were they not made redundant when the judge aquitted the Greens?

    Like

  2. jameshigham Avatar

    The Climate Scam has its antecedents.

    Like

  3. Diogenes Avatar
    Diogenes

    I don’t agree with the idea that right thinking people should avoid working in policy enforcement roles. It’s defeatist to allow the lunatics to completely take over the asylum.
    The Fabiens long ago realised the power of subversion from within, whilst libertarians are content to tut from the moral high ground.
    I dread to think what would have become of our police force if it weren’t for individuals like Gadget, Copperfield and Bloggs. I would much rather have people who weigh the morality of their actions than the enthusiastic zealots we so often meet.
    I would also like to see a few AGW sceptics in the NCE Team charged with investigating organisations attempting to ‘create a climate of fear’. They could start with the BBC, the Guardian, the Independent, the Met Office, the Hadley Centre and the UEA CRU.

    Like

  4. Dick Puddlecote Avatar

    Not alone at all, Tom. In fact, it’s rather scary.

    Like

  5. Tom Paine Avatar

    I take your point entirely. No doubt it would be for the greater good if all who would detest such roles applied for them. Isn’t it an inherent problem with any government that only people who believe it is a force for good apply to work as its officials?
    I was worrying about the young people themselves. They risk being gradually acclimatised to a role in a repressive regime. By the time they feel they must take a stand, doing so may have dire consequences.

    Like

  6. TDK Avatar
    TDK

    Worst of all, we know that the CRU destroyed much original data, which can now never be verified.
    If I understand the position it isn’t quite that bad. The CRU collected the data from various places around the world and after “adding value” destroyed the originals. In theory the data can be recollected.
    That doesn’t undermine your argument. Science relies on reproducibility and what the CRU have done (and they appear to have done it every step along the way) is to raise hurdles to reproduction.

    Like

Leave a reply to john miller Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar