THE LAST DITCH

About Magnus Lindkvist – Pattern Recognition.

I have just attended a fascinating presentation in Berlin by a young futurologist from Sweden, Magnus Lindkvist. The YouTube below is of him speaking (less well, in my view) at a TED event. His blog "Pattern Recognizing" is here.

Today, he was addressing a group of leaders in the real estate industry. In trying to analyse and explain social trends he mentioned blogging as an example of "bottom up" change. Arguing that no-one would set up a news operation today based on inked paper distributed by vans, he ridiculed attempts to prop up newspapers with subsidies and argued that new media were the future. This provoked reactions ranging from concern as to how readers can evaluate information from blogs to outright hostility.

One lady in the audience said that if she needed an operation, she would want – not a "citizen surgeon" – but a trained and experienced professional. Similarly, if she wanted information, she wanted it from a trained and experienced journalist. In doing so, she neatly illustrated Lindkvist's earlier comment that people tend to believe "normality" is the way things were when they first became adults and that everything that has changed since then is an irritating exception.

In the discussion that ensued, I did what I always do when someone ridicules blogging; I gave out the address of "Burning our Money." After all, Wat Tyler holds government to account for its use of public money far better than any conventional journalist. I was pleased to see many present noting it down. I hope Wat sees a spike in his numbers.

Those of us at home in the blogosphere forget how strange and frightening it seems to those intellectually nurtured on conventional media. Lindkvist simply dismissed "citizen surgeon" as a poor simile, but I am interested to know how you would have refuted the analogy in his place.

3 responses to “Fear of the future”

  1. John Avatar
    John

    Here’s some ideas for responses. Division of labour – you want a surgeon, a specialist, to do your surgery, not a GP. Equally, the citizen blogger can specialise in a way no journalist can. Better examples than Wat Tyler’s blog include the ScienceBlogs Select – their coverage of science is light years ahead of the mainstream media.
    Another approach is to question the comparison with surgery – a journalists specialism is writing rather than the subject they write about.
    Another approach is to question the incentives. Journalists must sell copy, which means controversy – if it bleeds it leads. Most bloggers don’t make a living from their blogs, so their incentives are different.
    Fourth, it should be recognised that some bloggers are journalists – freelancers who do earn a living from their blogs – like the usually excellent Michael Yon. New media doesnt mean an end to professionalism, just to dead business models.
    Ultimately, though, the best blogs are kept honest by their readership, which forms a community around the blog. It’s the difference between a broadcast and a conversation. Are there bad blogs? Yes. Are there sensationalist blogs? Of course. But despite a woeful lack of journalists credentials, where are the most informative sources, written for for the layperson on science, the court system, education, economics, politics, war, mathematics – in fact just about any subject you care to name? On the internet.

    Like

  2. jameshigham Avatar

    That woman’s prejudice is, of course, fuelled by gthe MSM themselves.

    Like

  3. Polaris Avatar

    Has she looked into Wikinomics and more importantly the role of polymaths, not specialists, in mankind’s major advances since ancient times? Moreover Journalism is a job which requires very little learned knowledge, and other than the ability to convey collated information in written form only general knowledge common to many of us is re. Surgery at the very least requires experience in technique and a good understanding of human physiology and biology – specialist knowledge.
    We learn good written communication skills and reasoned thought as a by product of academic study – anybody with a good basic education, and a mind of their own can become a journalist/writer/whatever – how good they are is subjective.
    A poor similie for sure, infantile and over simplistic.

    Like

Leave a reply to Polaris Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar

    They are servants. Just not of the public. He gets a full pension because he did his job for his…

  2. alec5384's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar