THE LAST DITCH

I watched Andrew Marr interview the leader of the illiberal non-democrats this morning. I believe his name is Clegg. He seems very representative of his pernicious party.

Distinguishing the LibDems from the Tories on civil liberties, he said indignantly that the Tories wanted to abolish the Human Rights Act, calling it the basis of our rights. There can be no better evidence that someone misunderstands the English. The Government cannot "give" us rights because all rights belong to us. The government only enjoys the powers (i.e. the abilities to limit our rights) that we give to it. His vision is of a nation of slaves, granted freedom by the State. That is the vision of Labour. It is profoundly un-English and rather revolting.

On the subject of taxation, he suggested that lower rate taxpayers "subsidise" higher rate payers who get "twice as much" tax relief on their pension savings. Again, this only makes sense if you believe that all wealth belongs to the state, so that money we are permitted to retain is some kind of gift. I can't even be bothered to critique it. It is surely quite obviously wrong to even the meanest intellect.

I am still not going to remember this lightweight's name. It's quite enough to know he's a political idiot with no understanding of the nation he aspires to lead.

7 responses to “Nick Clegg is un-English”

  1. jameshigham Avatar

    … and thus that party will get as close to power as I’m likely to get.

    Like

  2. JS Avatar
    JS

    Clegg is speaking as someone who has never had the problem of saving for retirement. He has a nice final-salary pension organised for him.
    We should ask him if he proposes to reduce the larger public sector pensions by an equivalent percentage in line with this.

    Like

  3. Felix Avatar
    Felix

    What a load of tripe, you make yourself sound an utter fool. I do hope you try to form a coherent argument next time you post, rather than blow more hot air around the web. “quite obviously wrong to even the meanest intellect” indeed…

    Like

  4. hesspartacus.wordpress.com Avatar

    Well, there really is no answer to such deeply considered and expertly argued remarks, Felix.
    The irony of the Liberal Democrats referring to themselves as such is a source of constant amusement to me.
    Clegg is indeed a lightweight, who shouldn’t be employed as a sub postmaster, let alone Prime Minister.

    Like

  5. QM Avatar

    The English common law tradition recognizes that people can do whatever the law does not specifically forbid, but in the continental Napoleonic Code tradition, people can only do what the law specifically allows. This leads people falsely to suppose that the state is giving them these rights, when it would be more accurate to say that the state is recognizing those rights. Our only responsibility to behave fairly and decently and it is something we owe to other people, not to government.

    Like

  6. Tom Paine Avatar

    Do please enlighten us, Felix. If it is not obviously wrong to you, perhaps you can explain?

    Like

  7. Kevyn Bodman Avatar
    Kevyn Bodman

    I’ve been away for a bit.Just got back, read this post, thought it was very good and was surprised at the comment by Felix,which I disagree with.

    Like

Leave a reply to Tom Paine Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar