THE LAST DITCH

It's not the system. It's the people. No system will prevent a thief from stealing. We may perhaps have less sympathy for a foolish householder who leaves his doors unlocked, but the fool is still wronged if burgled. The burglar is still at fault. Though I heard some cheeky pleas in mitigation in my brief time as a defence lawyer, it would be an impertinent thief who argued that it was not his fault he stole as the doors were open. Still less if they were open to him because he was a trusted servant.

The only plea in mitigation I could offer for dishonest MPs is that they were urged on, incited and abetted by their Speaker, the sorriest specimen ever to hold that august office. He occupies it by the brute force of Labour's majority, against all parliamentary tradition. He was put there to be partial to his own party and can only be judged a success by that one measure. He is a tribal thug, unfit for any office of trust.

I have already expressed my frustration that my limited command of Anglo-Saxon limits my ability to express my contempt for this crew of gutless sneak thieves. Mr Eugenides lays into the Speaker today as I would have been proud to be able to do. His writing, whether or not peppered with ripe Anglo-Saxon, is always splendid;

Contrary to what some might think, I am not contemptuous of tradition
and convention – far from it – but it has been clear for some time that
Speaker Martin is simply not equipped, by intellect or character, to
occupy that post.

As a fellow native of the finest city in these
isles, moreover, I do not say this out of some misplaced sense of
snobbery. It is not the fact that he is from Glasgow that is the
problem, but rather the fact that he is a Glasgow Labour MP of the very
worst sort – a bovine, chippy, venal, knuckle-dragging, tribal,
narrow-minded, grasping, slow-witted, nepotistic, mentally subnormal
dullard. In other words; a Glasgow Labour MP.

Archbishop Cranmer forlornly calls upon the Queen to exercise her own limited constitutional powers for the first time in her long reign. He does so in powerfully expressive words;

Your Majesty, please dissolve this decomposing parliament for the stench of decay reaches right to the nostrils of God.

I fear he has as much hope of God intervening personally, though I think she would be well justified in law. It is obvious to the slightest intellect that, not merely the government, but this whole parliament has lost the support of the people. It has no mandate. Gordon Brown is too small a man to do the right thing. If indeed, after an immoral career of manipulation, mendacity and malice, he retains the slightest notion of what it is.

4 responses to “They still don’t get it, do they?”

  1. Colin Campbell Avatar

    I think full police investigations and people being held to account is appropriate here. How is this different from welfare cheats and the like. Theft of public money.

    Like

  2. Kinderling Avatar

    Immoral people running the country. How do people wave a pass-key with nothing to show? Jordan did it with inflatable tits for the suckered dogs and then turned herself into a Barbie Doll for the suckered children. Tony Blair did it with inflatable truths for the suckered dogs and then turned himself into a Messiah for the suckered children. A broken mess behind them.

    Like

  3. Diogenes Avatar
    Diogenes

    On a positive note we have a unique opportunity to rid our legislature of the morally destitute. The monkey trap that is the parliamentary allowances scheme has exposed for all to see the nature of some of our representatives. The electorate can now smite the most venal little monkeys at their leisure.
    Mr Kinderling have you considered flogging your comments to Mr Heathcoat-Amory he pays good money (albeit ours) for that kind of stuff.

    Like

  4. Kinderling Avatar

    Diogenes, I do not know the gentleman, but I do know plastic people.

    Like

Leave a reply to Diogenes Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar