THE LAST DITCH

FT.com / Companies / Property – Property groups in £3bn call on shareholders.

The question to ask about this article is nothing to do with real estate. These major private companies are trying to raise a further three billion pounds from the markets because their banks may call in loans. These loans are performing (i.e. repayments are being made, interest is being paid), but the banks can choose to call them in because of a technical default. In simple terms the default consists of allowing (!) prices to fall so that the debt represents more than the agreed proportion of value.

Question: Why didn't the banks go to their shareholders when they fell into the equivalent technical default for their industry; i.e. their assets proving to be worth less than they thought so that they no longer met the regulatory requirement only to lend a certain multiple of their assets?

Answer: because the taxpayers were easier to ask.

3 responses to “Property groups in £3bn call on shareholders”

  1. Guthrum Avatar
    Guthrum

    Said it before, say it again,some of the Banks are beyond insolvent. RBS cannot even raise the funds to pay for the insurance on the Government bail out scheme.
    It is time to be honest and break up those banks into regional banks. Personally I have nothing left to lend them !

    Like

  2. William Gruff Avatar

    I don’t think it was because the tax payers were easier to ask but that the politicians were easier to frighten.

    Like

  3. Danny The Dog Avatar

    I think you will find the Sept18 08, electronic run on the dollar by Asia bailing out had a hand in the thinking of why did the politicos choose this path.
    This is a link
    This is politics not economics

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar