THE LAST DITCH

 Golliwog row: Mad, or just morally muddled? – Telegraph.
Dreamstime_5003429
It has been such an odd week that I have even found Libby Purves amusing for the first time ever. Normally, I find her smug mumsiness infuriating. A thought came back to me, as I read her "Man from Mars" piece, that has been occurring to me all week. What if the journalism about the economic crisis is as hysterical and inaccurate as that about the "snow event?" What if the journalists are striving as hard to make it "a story" as they did the meteorological circumstances of this week?

Perhaps I am having a late onset of optimism. However, I have long known that journalism (even specialised journalism) about my own field of expertise is always so utterly wrong that mere ignorance on the part of the journalists scarcely suffices to explain it. So why do I assume that there is any merit in their effusions about the subjects I know less well?

6 responses to “The truth. Is it out there?”

  1. Vasco Avatar
    Vasco

    ‘I have long known that journalism (even specialised journalism) about my own field of expertise is always so utterly wrong that mere ignorance on the part of the journalists scarcely suffices to explain it. So why do I assume that there is any merit in their effusions about the subjects I know less well?’
    Me too.

    Like

  2. Pogo Avatar

    And me…
    In recent years virtually everything that I’ve read in the MSM about a subject upon which I’m knowledgeable has proven to be almost completely wrong. In my case I suppose that it’s because it requires “scientific literacy” – something conspicuous by its absence in both journalists and the politicians they so frequently parrot – but I’m willing to accept that they’re as crap at reporting everything else as well.

    Like

  3. pedant2007 Avatar
    pedant2007

    Only scientific literacy, Pogo?

    Like

  4. John Avatar

    “I have long known that journalism (even specialised journalism) about my own field of expertise is always so utterly wrong . . .”
    What? I’m not the only one? There’s four of us?
    And I suspect that my own field of expertise is not that of the rest of you.

    Like

  5. Moggsy Avatar

    Yes you are so right. When it is a subject I know about I can see they get stuff wrong. When it is an actual incident I know about they get stuff wrong.
    More worrying, once, about one story I knew the facts of and several people involved, they told the true facts, but how they slanted them and what ones they mentioned made a news story out of a non story, with no concern about any harm/embarrassment they did those involved.
    I can’t see that was anything cleverly misrepresenting things to sell papers.
    I never properly trusted them to report honestly since.

    Like

  6. rechoboam@gmail.com Avatar
    rechoboam@gmail.com

    Several of my family have been interviewed for specialist subjects in the news.
    EVERYTHING they said was messed up by reporters or subs, every time.
    You may as well write a letter of correction/clarification before you even do the interview.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar