THE LAST DITCH

Link: Pensioner ordered to stop mowing grass because it’s too tidy – Telegraph.

The most interesting part of this everyday story of petty tyranny is the wording of the council’s comment to the press

"We apologise if he feels the letter he received from us is heavy-handed. We are happy to meet Mr Hubbard to discuss the issue."

Not, you note, "we apologise for the heavy-handed letter." The clear – and very disrespectful – implication is that Mr Hubbard’s feelings are irrational. Nor is this atypical. Consider this blog post for example. Why should any citizen be spoken to as the blogger’s professional referees were here by a civil servant who was neither very civil nor much inclined to serve?

Given the behaviour teachers in state schools have long been forced to tolerate, it is no surprise that their pupils carry on their arrogant, foul-mouthed disrespectful ways when they find their way into public employment. Private employers have competitors and must find ways to modify such behaviours or lose their customers. The state has no such need.

2 responses to “Pensioner ordered to stop mowing grass”

  1. MJW Avatar

    There’s two things going on:
    1) general arse covering- they’re not admitting to be twats – because that would involve sorting out whatever internal problem they have.
    2) Public sector insulation from the consequences of shocking customer service. Citizen’s involvement with these people is not consensual, therefore we can’t opt out because they are shit, we have no choice but to suffer them and they know it,

    Like

  2. Andrew Duffin Avatar
    Andrew Duffin

    Yes indeed, their letter does not say “sorry we goofed up, what idiots we are, continue as you were”, but rather they are never wrong and the only possible fault is that they worded their letter incorrectly.
    See also the case of the gardener who was prosecuted for having a sickle (wrongly described as a scythe – don’t these people even know what the badge of the old Soviet Union was?) in his van. When blown out by the court, they never said “we were stupid to bring this case, of course this guy is no danger to anyone, how daft of us”, but rather some weasel words about it being a shame it took such a long time to come to court.
    This sort of thing is done to show you who’s in charge.

    Like

Leave a reply to Andrew Duffin Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar