THE LAST DITCH

British_army_arrse
Link: British Army Rumour Service > > Forums > > The Serious Bit > > Current Affairs, News and Analysis > > Tory Frontbencher sacked over comments about racism in army.

It is with great regret that I judge Dave Cameron to have done the right thing in dismissing Patrick Mercer as a front-bench spokesman. It is not the way he should have to behave. Perhaps he even knows it. However, Britain is in the grip of a "racism" witch-hunt. The Left sees it everywhere and the media support them. Mercer is no racist. There was nothing remotely racist about his reported remarks. He should have known though that they would be "spun" as racist, which unfortunately makes him too naieve to be on the front-benches at present.

How sad that the McCarthyism of the race relations industry should claim the political scalp of a decent, honourable man with a fine record of service to his country. How pathetic that truth has been trumped by political expedience.

Over on the always-interesting ARmy Rumour SErvice site, the forums are expressing a rather more trenchant and less political view than mine. I wish our country was more worthy of them. To extract just one quote from a torrent of robustly supportive messages for Mercer:

"I tend to be a tory by nature but Camoron has just lost my vote and I suspect a lot of people like me for his complete toss reaction to the racist industry. Idiot. No balls at all."

I would really like to be able to demur. Unfortunately, "balls" are not permitted equipment for British politicians at present. Let’s hope they will one day be standard issue again. In the meantime, I worry about the morale of our overstretched and endangered armed forces. The unwitting author of New Labour’s manifesto, George Orwell, had it right when he wrote:

"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."

In Orwell’s day, even left-wing Etonians understood the importance of the military. How long can we keep asking these men to follow the orders of a political Establishment that so clearly despises them?

4 responses to “The Army’s view of Patrick Mercer”

  1. Guthrum Avatar
    Guthrum

    I posted on Iain Dales blog the comment that in terms of the current ‘group think’ politics Cameron had to sack him. However I simply do not believe he has said anything that can be construed as racist, and his behaviour in the past gives nothing to raise concerns of this nature. I would rather follow Mercer into the trenches than Cameron.

    Like

  2. Surreptitious Evil Avatar

    Mercer had to go – the media would have endlessly distracted the Tories from what limited policies they actually have (as yet) and given the dregs of British politics endless airtime (sorry, even more airtime than …)
    The man is clearly not a racist and I hope he will be a significant part of the next Government.
    S-E

    Like

  3. jameshigham Avatar

    I’m not so sure he should ahve been sacked. James Cleverly wrote on this and it seems fairly innocuous to me.

    Like

Leave a reply to Surreptitious Evil Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar