THE LAST DITCH

Link: BBC NEWS | Education | Expulsions ‘fuelled by prejudice’.

Three times as many black children as white children are expelled from school. Allegedly, this is because of “institutional racism.”

An Ofsted report in 1999 warned that many schools are “institutionally racist”, citing evidence that Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black Caribbean and traveller children were failing to make adequate progress.

Curiously however, children from Indian and Chinese backgrounds do better than average in British schools. According to official reports,

Indian and Chinese pupils outperform other groups in all assessments.

Surely this would not be the case if the problem were institutional racism? Do racists in the education system distinguish between Chinese and West Indians, between Indians and Pakistanis?

Something is clearly causing “..Pakistani, Bangladeshi, Black Caribbean and traveller children…” to perform below average in our schools. I don’t claim to know what it is but, logically, it cannot be racism – “institutional” or otherwise.

Given the strong opprobrium that now rightly attaches to racists in Britain, is it responsible, fair or even decent for Government agencies to label whole sections of our society as institutionally-racist? Do we really employ these people, including the half-witted journalists at the BBC who can’t detect such flimsy logic, to libel us? It’s time the CRE was disbanded and all this nonsense stopped.

7 responses to “Expulsions ‘fuelled by prejudice’”

  1. james higham Avatar

    I had quite a bit to do with Nigerians, Jamaicans and Indians in south London and can only confirm your comments.

    Like

  2. Matt M Avatar

    The problem is that you have a large number of people (a lot of them working for Ofsted, apparently) who are incapable of seeing black people through anything other than the framework of race and racism.

    Like

  3. Jeremycj Avatar

    In answer to your post – Yes.

    Like

  4. Cleanthes Avatar

    Jeremycj,
    “Yes”, it is responsible, fair and decent for Govt agencies to declare that entire sections of the population are institutional racist
    or
    “yes”, we employ these people to libel us?

    Like

  5. TheTinDrummer Avatar

    The saddest about this is that most likely, instead of vigorously defending itself, the profession will fawn and grovel, accepting the attack and more besides.

    Like

  6. JM Avatar
    JM

    I think it’s fairly well established that in inner city areas, white kids are right at the bottom of the heap of achievement. The faulty logic comes because average black attainment is compared not to white peers but to “all” whites.

    Like

Leave a reply to Jeremycj Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar