THE LAST DITCH

Some years ago I got talking to a man on a train. He was senior adviser to the then Education Minister. He told me a story of which he was proud. The large stores on Oxford Street had complained about shoplifting by pupils from local schools during lunch breaks. He had met with representatives of the stores and persuaded them to donate money to finance lunchtime activities to keep the pupils away from the shops. I told him it was not a new idea. Organised criminals called it a “protection racket.” He laughed, but acknowledged I had a point.

We hear a lot from government about crime but although they like to compare themselves to businesses, talking cheerily of “services” and “customers,” they resemble organised crime much more than they resemble your friendly local capitalists.

Consider the consequences if you don’t pay your taxes. Are they any different than if you fail to pay your local mobster his cut? Ultimately no. Taxes are legitimised extortion; demanding money with menaces. An interviewee on 18 Doughty Street last night laughed at a viewer who objected to paying tax to support political parties of which he did not approve. “Spending money on things you disapprove of is what Governments do,” he said, “that’s no argument.”

Of course, he had a point. When the local mob has extorted its cut of your profits, you would hardly dare to tell them how to spend it. It was only surprising, on reflection, that a supporter of legalised extortion should be so frank about his contempt for naieve people who expect government to take account of their views.

What about the local and national tax paid for the “police service” (as the spin doctors have renamed it from the more honest “police force”)? How exactly does that differ from “protection money?” If you don’t pay it, the forces offering to protect you will be used against you. It’s the same deal, except that the service is inferior. I would love to pay “Vinnie No Neck” to break the legs of the scum who so frightened my wife that she no longer feels safe alone at our house in England. Would the local police do that for me? Of course not. We didn’t even bother to call them. We knew they wouldn’t come. Would they let me do it myself? Of course not. They are there to protect their gang bosses from me.

The National Lottery is the “numbers game” and the wise guys running the racket divert the proceeds to unauthorised purposes by stuffing the relevant committee with members of their own political “family”. The examples go on and on.

Don’t let your local politicoes fool you by using the consumer-friendly language of those nice businessmen who meet your needs on competitive terms. Their business model is quite different, but it is by no means unique.

3 responses to “Government; the ultimate organised crime”

  1. Bel Avatar

    Interesting analogy. I never looked at it that way, but yes, you have a point.
    What gets to me is the failure of Government (Labour or Conservative) to appreciate that even after the taxes have been extracted from us, and paid into the Treasury, it is still our money.
    This is why they have no regard for our views on how the money is spent. In their reasoning, it now belongs to ‘them’. That is why Gordon Brown has the gall to stand up in Parliament and say things like ‘I could have cut taxes, but have decided instead to spend the money on XYZ’, while being cheered to the rafters by ignorant Labour MPs.

    Like

  2. james higham Avatar

    I was just about to say that Bel has extended the idea over at her site and here she is above.
    As I said over there, they have no concept that it is not their money to extract but ours to offer for the well-being of society.

    Like

  3. A Lucky Reader Avatar
    A Lucky Reader

    Thank you for finding the time to write and post. I relish coming here.
    It surprises me to no end that the UK has managed to become both lawless and authoritarian at the same time. I read the link about Mrs. Paine and the housebreakers with amazement. There is nothing paradisic about the Middle America I inhabit, but goodness, those lads would certainly have had shortened careers here.
    Even if they had not been shot by the first householder they had mistakenly found at home, which I’d give middling odds, there is no possible way they would not have been torn to pieces by the average dog resident at the average house around here.
    As somebody who travels overnight for business, I always sleep better knowing that the family mutt is a lot more devoted to my wife’s safety than any police force in the world could be.
    Best wishes.

    Like

Leave a reply to Bel Cancel reply

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar