Stop the Khanage by Tom Paine.
I'm not political at all. I am a mother of four children and I don't think they're safe in London. Mr Khan is not doing a very good job as Mayor

THE LAST DITCH
Stop the Khanage by Tom Paine.
I'm not political at all. I am a mother of four children and I don't think they're safe in London. Mr Khan is not doing a very good job as Mayor
“Both parties are right wing only in the “social” senses that I am not.”
Spot on.
LikeLike
‘Outlawing the initiation of force or fraud, operating an independent judiciary and an effective police force, and the defence of the realm’
All OK.
What about the government role for controls on immigration? Or on the other hand – open borders?
What is your position on this issue?
I am firmly and proudly anti-Islam. I would stop all muslim immigration immediately.
In contrast I would allow, welcome and encourage Christian refugees from muslim countries. My immigration policy would be highly discriminatory on religious grounds.
In a debate I might try to use some rhetoric to include the ending of mjuslim immigration under the heading of ‘defence of the realm’.
Anyway, that’s my view; what is yours?
LikeLike
I would welcome immigrants to a libertarian state because there would be no welfare. People would only come to work and contribute so that would be fine. If they couldn’t or wouldn’t work they’d starve. Any that posed a military threat would be dealt with under the defence of the realm heading. Any that commited crimes would be dealt with by the police — with no need for any special provisions as all humans would be equal before the law.
As long as being in receipt of full welfare benefits in the U.K. puts you in the top 10% of the world economically, then immigration controls are unfortunately necessary. In a democracy they need to be the subject of open honest discussion.
LikeLike
Thank you. I follow your reasoning and see a lot of merit in it. Were there to be no Welfare State then we could be a lot more confident about the quality and motivation of those seeking to immigrate.
However, I think the idea of removing state welfare is impossible to achieve. Not difficult, impossible.
As for ‘open and honest discussion’ – difficult to achieve but not impossible. There are tings I say in private that would get me arrested if I said them in the public square. Fighting against the growth of the idea,which is present both in law and in polite society, that ‘you can’t say that’ is an important fight to take up and continue.
Anyway, thanks for your thoughtful and clear reply.
LikeLike

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.
Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.
He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that
“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”
Receive content by email
The problem is that they already know about the blog and some read it. Why is that an issue? If…
Conversationally, I already operate on NATO “no first strike” principles. I am not going to start a political discussion with…
Why don’t you stick with what you are doing on the blogs but simply withdraw from discussion on politics with…
Thanks for your words of encouragement, gents. I don’t have a problem with political or spiritual differences and never have.…
I’m not really surprised. You live in the Leftie capital of the UK and most down there are pretty woke.…
Leave a comment