THE LAST DITCH

Out – and into the world: why The Spectator is for Leave.

Cover_180616_landscapeI subscribed to The Spectator today because it seems to be the only publication consistently speaking for the best interests of the people of Britain.
 
Now I have to decide if my decades-long subscription to The Economist should go the same way as the one I cancelled last year to the Financial Times, which is now far pinker than it looks.
 
I do love this image from the current Spectator cover. It is a picture worth a thousand words and expresses my feelings about the referendum perfectly.

2 responses to “Out – and into the world: why The Spectator is for Leave”

  1. James Higham Avatar
    James Higham

    It was quite well constructed, his argument.

    Like

  2. Tom Avatar

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar