THE LAST DITCH

BBC News – Alan Milburn says child poverty 'no longer problem of the workless and work-shy'.


I am trying to stay positive in the face of a nation gone mad. I really am. I was much helped by a pleasant meal last night with a fellow-blogger and occasional commenter here whose views are relentlessly sane.

I even briefly managed to do it in the face of Alan Milburn's certifiable analysis of the woes of our poor. He thinks we need higher minimum wages to price more low-skilled people out of work and perhaps even make offshoring fashionable again. No trace of sanity there but still I managed to keep smiling.

Sadly, however I made the mistake of reading the comments on the linked article at the BBC website. The drivel there is enough to make the brightest optimist despair.

Try this for size;
The real reason why poverty is increasing is that we have had government after government making public sector cuts. This has led to more expensive services and unemployment which forces wages down. And all this has been done in the name of tax cuts for the rich. 
or this
Rent and utility bills are killing everybody including business, they must be capped and energy re-nationalized. I don't care if people think it's socialism because at what point do you say capitalism with no rules or morals has to stop and isn't working?
or this
So much for our government's claim that work is what stops poverty and benefits is (sic) what keeps people in it
or even this
I couldn't care less how well the banking sector is doing or what the GDP is or the UK's position in wealth tables is so long as I can turn the lights and heating on and eat decent food without worrying about the cost. [my emphasis] MAJOR wealth distribution needed
Yes, of course. That will all work in Britain. After all remember how well it worked in China, the USSR, Eastern Europe, Cuba and – oh wait – here.

Was ever any man as wrong as Francis Fukuyama? Despite the comprehensive proof of its failure when tested disastrously on more than half of mankind in the 20th Century, it seems the cancerous doctrine of socialism will never die in Britain until the government's cheques actually start to bounce. Not while the state's employees, corruptees and other dependents retain the vote. This despite their conflict of interest, not just with taxpayers, but with the fabric of reality itself.

5 responses to “Work, apparently, is not the answer. Is it idleness then?”

  1. Antisthenes Avatar
    Antisthenes

    I do believe that we have gone too far now in the direction of big state central planning and control to reverse it and will have to wait for it’s collapse as history tells us it will. Unfortunately that could take decades so reliance on the state will beget reliance on the state which in turn will mean the state taking more and more powers and becoming increasingly tyrannical. We wanted to abdicate self-reliance and personal responsibility to the state so we deserve what is in store for us, at least most of us do.

    Like

  2. Tom Avatar

    You may be right but you are talking about the rest of my life lived under ever worsening tyranny. 

    Like

  3. Antisthenes Avatar
    Antisthenes

    I do not know how old you are but probably yes. I suspect for myself being quite old I shall escape the worst of it as it is yet to come. There is an alternative future but that is not a very bright one either. All the printing and borrowing has left us very little with which to combat another financial crisis. So if the politicians do not do for us then another recession will. However there is always the euro-zone that can so easily implode and then if you escape that then there is bound to be mad terrorist who may fancy planting a chemical or nuclear device near you.

    Like

  4. Moggsy Avatar
    Moggsy

    There are a lot of people who make comments like the ones you quoted and who get to vote, are “Hard of thinking”.
    They are lazy thinkers that don’t follow a thought past the very surface, are badly informed and ignorant of the facts.
    They seem to think (if they do at all) that their opinion is always as valid as any other because of their worth as a person, rather than because it actually makes any sense or not.

    Like

  5. Tom Avatar

    Stepping back from the political dimension, perhaps the biggest change in Britain in my lifetime has been the educational focus on self-esteem and the equal value of all opinions, whether well- or ill-informed.
    I was at the O2 last night for a show by comedian Micky Flanagan. I enjoyed it because he’s funny. He’s also stupid, immoral and convinced of the merit of his world-view. As a comedian, he’s not doing much harm, but you have to wonder how a democracy is supposed to function if people are quite so lacking in self-awareness.
    I am not crusty enough in middle-age to think people are generally more stupid than when I was young. They may even be cleverer on average. But whereas stupid people then were self-aware and had some humility they are now arrogant. If leaders in business, politics and the arts spend all their time angling for the approval of the stupid, they might as well be stupid themselves.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar