politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Can Ed win support for state funding of political parties?.
The problem is that they already know about the blog and some read it. Why is that an issue? If…

THE LAST DITCH
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Can Ed win support for state funding of political parties?.
There is a delicious logic in proclaiming that as funding for political parties is becoming ever more difficult to find, therefore the State should intervene in order to provide funding.
Or, to re-word that, the people have by and large decided that they do not wish to pay anything towards the political parties. Therefore the parties have decided that they will just take the money anyway.
A little thought makes the flaw in their logic apparent. Analysing the argument, we have:
1. Existing funding sources for the 3 main political parties are drying up.
2. Those 3 parties are essential to the proper operation of British democracy.
3. The maintenance of democracy in the UK has the support of the populace
4. Therefore the State should provide the necessary funding.
But, I hear you all ask, where is the evidence for step 2?
LikeLike
I’m not sure that not wanting to be the victim of theft is “banning” something.
State funding will be carried out via the taxation system. If you refuse to pay your taxes you go to jail.
A political party demanding money with menaces is no different to your local hoodie.
This may have been the most far-sighted ploy Cameron has ever carried out, when he said years ago that we should hug them.
LikeLike
They should ban party names on ballot papers – political brands have too much power.
LikeLike
I agree completely.
MPs pay lip service to representing all their constituents but when push comes to shove they kowtow to their gangmasters.
The party system is the main obstacle separating us from democracy.
LikeLike
I am rarely in favour of banning anything but I believe no political party should be allowed to receive money from non-members.
See where you’re coming from but banning is a sticky wicket, a thin edge. Declaration is another way.
LikeLike

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.
Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.
He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that
“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”
Receive content by email
The problem is that they already know about the blog and some read it. Why is that an issue? If…
Conversationally, I already operate on NATO “no first strike” principles. I am not going to start a political discussion with…
Why don’t you stick with what you are doing on the blogs but simply withdraw from discussion on politics with…
Thanks for your words of encouragement, gents. I don’t have a problem with political or spiritual differences and never have.…
I’m not really surprised. You live in the Leftie capital of the UK and most down there are pretty woke.…
Leave a comment