THE LAST DITCH

Twitter / Shahid Ahmad: When Theo van Gogh was mur ….

 Blogger Shahid Ahmad of Suspect Paki is tweeting furiously about this shocking story. A Russian in Germany was being prosecuted at the instigation of a Muslim couple for "insult and abuse". The accused strode across the court room and stabbed complainant Marwa el-Sherbini 18 times in front of her 3 year old son, killing her. She was pregnant. It is a disgusting crime, which in the Muslim world is now giving rise to rage against "the West" in general and Germany in particular.

Of course, no decent human approves of the crime. Of course, the killer will be prosecuted for murder and (unless proven insane) convicted. But Shahid is convinced that, not the incident itself, but the way in which the media have reported it is evidence of "islamophobia" and "racism."

He makes the point that when Theo van Gogh was murdered it was treated not as the act of a madman, but as an expression of Muslim extremism. He asks why this incident is viewed differently. Perhaps one answer is that it's because there are no organised groups encouraging such behaviour or applauding it when it occurs. Another might be that "Western" public opinion is united in considering the action wrong and the actor evil. So where's the story?

One has to ask though. If one strips away his hyperbole does Shahid have a point?

5 responses to “Does Shahid have a point?”

  1. jameshigham Avatar

    Just like the feminazis, the muslims will turn people against them eventually. The problem is that the innocent will also get hurt.

    Like

  2. Kinderling Avatar

    There’s that ‘Gay-Moment’ again of libertarians seeing an equal premis when it is not there.
    Everything is about intent, not as you share with us, ‘effect’.
    Van Gough’s talents were employed to express how Islam subjugated women. That was his intent to help liberate women from a perverse religion. He was killed by a Mohammedian (as is their duty). This is of public interest to acknowledge this huge elephant-in-the-room Jim Jones cult amongs us.
    A German insulted the hijab, as not worn by free women. That was his intent. He was hauled up and ‘econnomically killed’ by the state as a racist. The victim, the Mohammedette, used the law to protect and propegate the Paedophile of Peace. The life of a free man taken by the piety of a child-poisoner.
    The difference is one rageful man defended his liberty, the other rageful shields the false name of an abuser lest they be found out. They are not the same. I do not want you to defend me when I am falsely accused.

    Like

  3. Shahid Avatar

    Thanks for the publicity, but would you mind removing my picture from here please?

    Like

  4. Tom Paine Avatar

    I am somewhat puzzled, but happy to oblige.

    Like

  5. Shahid Avatar

    Many thanks, appreciated.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar