THE LAST DITCH

'Sexpat' lawyer who published online erotic novel sacked from City firm – Telegraph.

As a general principle, how does the publication (in whatever medium) of a novel by a member of its staff bring a company into disrepute? I can't see that the firm in question was ever mentioned on the website where this novel was published by instalments. Surely this aspiring author was entitled to her freedom of expression? Frankly, I doubt most of us would ever have known who this lady worked for without the publicity attendant on her employer's actions.

Mind you, my sympathy for her has diminished somewhat since learning of her response to her firing. Rather than claiming unfair dismissal on the grounds that her creative endeavours were none of their damned business, she is alleging past sexual misconduct by another member of the firm. How odd that she should only now have remembered that!

I understand that a majority of unfair dismissal cases brought by women in England & Wales now feature such allegations. Either Englishmen are more sexually aggressive than the French would have us believe, or the ladies in question are gilding the lily in an attempt to secure a better settlement. O tempora, o mores!

One response to “‘Sexpat’ sacked”

  1. Andrew Duffin Avatar
    Andrew Duffin

    There was quite possibly some small print in her Terms and Conditions which said she was not allowed to publish ANYTHING without the firm’s permission.
    Such clauses are far from rare, big firms being so risk-averse and afraid of litigation, however absurd.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar