THE LAST DITCH

Link: Doctors face prison for denying right to die | the Daily Mail.

First the Labour Party denied us the right to free speech, criminalising what we say. Then, by penalising “hate crimes” more severely than others, they made clear that some lives are more valuable than others. Then they claimed ownership of our bodies. Their ID Card legislation entitles them to assault us intimately to take our “biometric data.”

Their intellectuals speculate as to whether an old person might have a duty to die to relieve younger family members of the “burden” they have become (making it easier to pay mortgages and taxes). Now, with dark and inexorable logic, they impose on doctors a duty – a legal obligation – to kill by withdrawing medical care.

Did they ever grant such “rights” or impose such “duties” without later broadening them? How long before those families with mortgages and taxes to pay have the “right” to demand that doctors kill their stricken relatives? How long after that before hospital managements can order death by way of “rational allocation of resources?”

Doctors, let’s not deny it, have sometimes taken the decision – in consultation with patients and family – to withdraw life support. That was a matter for their consciences. But now those consciences have been nationalised, expropriated, brought under State control.

Today, Labour sets out to harden the consciences of doctors. Soon enough, when those consiences are sufficiently calloused, they will turn them into executioners.

Could anything make more clear the moral abyss into which the Labour Party has fallen? Ultimately, the abstract love of ones fellow man which some Socialists feel (and others pretend to feel for electoral advantage) is not merely a lesser version of love; it is its antithesis.

One response to “Doctors face prison for denying right to die | the Daily Mail”

  1. The Tin Drummer Avatar

    Another great post, full of restrained anger and humanity; also whose fingerprints do we see over this repressive, destructive and soulless law?
    Lord Falconer’s. A man who has done his best to trample over Britain’s consitution, now gets his grubby, amoral, utilitarian, “human rights-interested” hands on the ancient ethics which we have tried to believe in, even if we’ve failed to keep them. Now he issues guidelines for doctors to be severely punished for not killing people. What a vile man.

    Like

Leave a comment

Tom is a retired international lawyer. He was a partner in a City of London law firm and spent almost twenty years abroad serving clients from all over the world.

Returning to London on retirement in 2011, he was dismayed to discover how much liberty had been lost in the UK while he was away.

He’s a classical liberal (libertarian, if you must) who, like his illustrious namesake, considers that

“…government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.”

Latest comments
  1. Lord T's avatar
  2. tom.paine's avatar
  3. Lord T's avatar
  4. tom.paine's avatar
  5. Lord T's avatar